Certified in Public Health (CPH) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Certified in Public Health Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What evaluation category is best suited for tracking program participation and community feedback?

  1. Cost-effectiveness

  2. Impact

  3. Outcome

  4. Process

The correct answer is: Process

The category of evaluation that is best suited for tracking program participation and community feedback is known as process evaluation. This type of evaluation focuses on the implementation of a program, assessing how well it is being carried out and identifying any areas that require adjustment. Specifically, process evaluation examines the activities that are implemented, participant engagement levels, and the quality of services delivered. By tracking program participation, process evaluation provides insights into who is taking part in the program, how often they participate, and whether the intended audience is being reached. This information is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of recruitment strategies and for making necessary adaptations to improve engagement. Furthermore, community feedback is a critical component of process evaluation as it gathers insights from participants and stakeholders regarding their experiences, opinions, and suggestions for improvement. This feedback can inform program development and adjustment, ensuring that the program remains relevant and responsive to community needs. In contrast, the other categories focus on different aspects: cost-effectiveness evaluates the economic efficiency of the program, impact assesses the long-term changes brought about by the program, and outcome evaluation looks at the immediate effects or results of the program. While all these evaluations provide valuable information, they do not specifically address the ongoing tracking of participation and community feedback in the same way that process evaluation